ICT Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

ICT - Assignment ExampleThe cases related to sell of parcel is controlled by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Furthermore, right of digital induces is evolving worldwide at a significant pace. It can be stated that contract justness or law in general is non static. Instead, laws be often quite dynamic that ingest in responding to new occurrence and innovation (Schwanzer, 2007). Based on the above mentioned statement, this report intends to discuss whether bundle product system is to be classified as goods or services by taking into concern the notion of contract law along with its various implications. Discussion Specially mentioning, consumers engaged in buying software are not generally entitled to enjoy the same rights as in the case of purchasing tangible products. In this regard, it can be stated that software is a term, which is often used to describe the accretion of instruction and data that facilitate computers to function in an effective manner. Evide ntly, computers are redundant without proper industriousness of software. This implies that computers are unable to perform tasks in an effective manner without the installation of software. From the profound perspective, software is noteworthy for two major reasons. The first major reason can be related with its unique characteristics, disclosure that software is not similar to any conventional law. The second major reason can be noted as that despite the widespread use of software in the modern commercial arena, it does not have any distinct ratified entity. Correspondingly, there is no specific manner through which legal treatment should be implemented to resolve software related disputes. Thus, this uncertainty largely raises a question, whether software should be considered or to be classified as goods or services (Green & Saidov, 2007). The lack of precision, surrounding the legal principle of software can be regarded as both(prenominal) commercially inconvenient and con ceptually arbitrary. The buyers of software often possess the similar expectation of rights, while purchasing other items that are recognized at a lower place the law. However, in the recent time, the refusal to consider software as goods or services can be identify as the failure of law to protect the expectation and the interest of the buyers of software. Correspondingly, the two product related aspects i.e. tangibleness and movability determine the characteristics of software (Green & Saidov, 2007). In this similar context, tangibility is commonly defined as possessing a physical form or being able to be perceived by senses. It can be argued that this notion acted as the stumbling block towards considering software as goods. The relevancy of tangibility for adjudging software as a good can be ascertained owing to the reason that most of the legal system defines the sales of contract as a sort of agreement, which is associated with the transfer of property in goods in exchange o f money, denoted as price. Consequently, such transfer generally requires transfer of possession (Green & Saidov, 2007). However, in the case of possession of intangible service, both civil and common law signifies that possession of intangible is not possible and also cannot be owned. However, software can be acquired and possessed, making it tangible. Similarly, the aspect of