The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp - Essay Example The following discussion reflects on the events that occurred in the life of Colonel Blimp (Candy) during his tenure in the British army, with relevance to the actual situation at the time (Moor, 2012:45). The British cinematography intended to produce the movie for public viewing as of the year 1943. However, government interventions harbored the intended progress arguing that it contained sophisticated information that would not be allowed to the public as it belonged to the government. Colonel Blimp, characterized by Lieutenant Candy, is a borrowing from David Low’s artistic representations that conveyed militarized stories of a soldier who reflected an extend of stupidity in his decisions (Street, 2005:46). As observed with Candy, the degree of stupidity is undoubtedly high to the extent that he leads his battalion regiment in most weird ways. For instance, after receiving news that a battle would probably erupt in the night, Candy reacts promptly in readiness of the battl e. He carries out a military test to kidnap and imprison some of his seniors without any authority (Moor, 2012). However, his intentions target of ensuring the junior officers that in conducting a successful test, they would probably win in the expected battle. With clear confidence of a win in the battle, they intrude the general’s sauna in a spacious and equally protected building. Candy expresses to his general that he was conducting a test and that he had fallen a victim. The general gimmicks Candy’s confidence as he questions him in the act, whereby Candy recites his wish to win in the forthcoming battle (Connelly, 2005:47). This reflects an act of aggression but on the contrary remains inconsistent with the law since military orders emanate from the highest ranked individual in the hierarchy. Therefore, Lieutenant Candy exceeds his authority but argues out that the exercise would be a motivation and a guarantee that the British would win the battle. Through his u nexpected raid at the general’s house, Candy indicates his insatiable interest in winning the battle and assures his subjects that they shall pursue the enemy before the declaration of the battle (Moor, 2012:48). The approach to the battle portrays the unethical tactics that the British government endured on in combating their enemies during the first and second world wars. The general warns Candy over the untimely invasions citing that they should not advance or strike in the battlefield unless authorities declare the war officially. Colonel Blimp declines to the idea and challenges his superior without showing respect to the rank. The two argue out on the best process but Candy declines and insults his general as one filled with cowardice and lacking the spirit of aggression. The general feels humiliated and retaliates to the youthful lieutenant telling him that he would realize of how stupid a youth is in his olden days. Finally, they engage in a fight and eventually the g eneral draws Candy into the pool. As Candy swims out of the pool, he is older and in accordance to the hospitality drawn towards him, it is easier to establish that he is highly ranked in the army. Currently, Candy seems to have a denial on military duties and continuously has cultivated comical aspects instead of the serious military role model. Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger write the movie in a way that they portray the characters in

Paradoxically, although modernity appeared to be a threat to Essay

Paradoxically, although modernity appeared to be a threat to Christianity, it had been nurtured, in significant part, by Christ - Essay Example Modernity mainly believes in what it sees and in the current living style only. It is for this reason that modernity is greatly affected by factors such as fashion trends, money, and status. On the other hand, Christianity believes that there is something more to staying alive and surviving in the world (Asad, 2003, 18). Therefore, clearly it appears modernity may be a threat to Christianity (Augustine, Pusey & William, 2011, 32). However, despite these threats caused by modernity, it has been found that it is actually Christianity that has fuelled modernity into place. Through a large number of factors, Christianity has significantly nurtured modernity and caused it to develop in the society. Although modernity has brought about poor moral values that were not there in the traditional world, most of these traits mainly arise from Christianity in a broad sense. In addition, the way in which Christian beliefs are changing with time, they may give rise to modernity (Augustine, Pusey & William, 2011, 33). This is because; modernity is not an original lifestyle. It a living style that has grown from what was originally in the world. Since Christianity has been in place for a longer period than modernity, then it can be argued that modernity picked its traits from Christian ways of life. Modernity tries to ape what was original and thus, the human beings themselves shape it. The fuelling of modernity by Christianity can be clearly observed from the politics practiced in the world today (Berglund, Bruce & Brian, 2010, 11). For a number of years, Christianity had no part to play in politics. Politics have been referred to as a ‘dirty game’ and thus, Christianity believes that leadership only comes from God. This way, Christians would believe that God would choose His own rightful leaders and thus, they would not actively participate in the politics. This subject has been thought as bringing modernity into the world. This is because; with Christianity not participating in the political arena, politics were left in the hands of non-Christians. Consequently, politics were practiced without considering or taking into account, the Christian values written in the Bible or initially practised by the people (Brown, John & Kim, 2008, 15). There being no opposition, modernity took its course and directed the political field. Leaders would come up with modern ways of meeting their objectives and solving any challenges that they faced. In addition, conflict resolution was no longer conducted using the religious laws in the Bible. Instead, modern arms used to fight the enemy were built up and murder was no longer considered a sin. Indeed Christianity can be said to have fuelled modernity into place. This is because; had Christians taken part in the political environment, politics could have been conducted in the right manner without using modern ways of gaining power. In addition, failure of Christian involvement, also led to increased corruptio n among the people (Carter, 2000, 84). Political leaders were now eager to find ways of doing things in a fast and easy way. It is in this way that modernity found its way into the world economy since; major inventions were being made to ease the way of life. Christianity was also not effective in teaching the people the right way of life (Kung, 1980, 74). While people know that they should